Count
Karl Ludwig von Grunne (1808-1884)
Born 25 August 1808 Wien
Died 15 June 1884 Baden nr Wien
Married 16 May 1831 Wien
Countess Caroline von und zu Trauttmansdorff-Weinsberg
Born 29 February 1808 Wien
Died 19 March 1886 Wien
When Karl's mother died in 1811, he and his two sisters found a
home in the
household of the Archduke Karl. Little is known about his
youth, but the
strict military atmosphere of the Archduke's household
and the influence
of his father would have been decisive for the
development
of his character. In 1828 when he was just twenty he
entered the
army. He was almost twenty-three when he married, 16 May
1831, Countess
Caroline von Trauttmansdorff-Weinsberg. Subsequently
they produced
five children.
He began his military career as a Subaltern in the 3rd regiment of
Ulans of the
Archduke Karl. On 16 February 1829 he was promoted to
full Lieutenant
with the 10th regiment of Hussars. On 2 July 1838 he
became a Captain
of Cavalry and was transferred to the 1st regiment of
Ulans and attached
to the Archduke Albrecht in the autumn of 1839 for
the latter's
journey to Russia. Archduke Albrecht wrote to Karl's
father about
the close friendship that had developed between him and
young Karl.
Karl also wrote from Moscow full of enthusiasm for the
Archduke. In
December 1842 Karl was made Lieutenant-Colonel in the 7th
Cheveauxlegers
regiment. On 23 December 1843 he was made Colonel in
the 2nd regiment
of Hussars. At this time he left the Army to enter
the service
of the Court.
He was appointed Head Chamberlain to the Archduke Stephen, the
Governor of
Bohemia. When the Archduke succeeded his father to become
Palatine of
Hungary in 1847, Karl Grunne followed him as his Head
Chamberlain.
He was soon to meet his future Lord and Emperor. The
Emperor Ferdinand
appointed the young Archduke Franz to represent him
at the installation
of the new Palatine in Pressburg on 12 November
1847. There
was general enthusiasm among those present over the
address by the
Archduke, delivered in perfect Hungarian.
Soon Grunne, out of his loyalty to the Emperor, could no longer
agree with the
political position taken by the Palatine. He left the
service of the
Archduke as the latter fell ever more under the
influence of
the Hungarian radicals. However, the personal good
relations between
Gr?nne and the Archduke remained unimpaired. In June
1848, aged 39,
Grunne became Head Chamberlain to the 18 year-old
Archduke Franz.
Although far from a position of power at Court, Grunne
from the outset
showed qualities of energy, tact, thoroughness and
initiative which
made him an ideal mediator in a number of difficult
situations and
quickly won him the confidence of the entire royal
household.
As an early assignment he was sent in September 1848 to mediate
on behalf of
the Court between the Archduke Stephen and Fieldmarshal
Jellachich,
the Ban of Croatia. Jellachich had been ordered to put
down the movement
for independence in Hungary, led by Kossuth and the
Revolutionary
Party. The Archduke was in a difficult situation for, as
Palatine, he
was Head of Government of a country under threat from the
Emperor's senior
Fieldmarshal. He sought the support from the Emperor
for his position
and requested that Jellachich be ordered to halt his
advance. Both
sides consulted Grunne, who supported Jellachich, but
achieved an
outcome which, while suppressing the revolt, was lenient
to the Hungarians
to ease their return to the fold. Grunne was next
involved on
behalf of the Court in negotiations to put an end to the
October 1848
uprising in Vienna. Although not actively involved in the
early stages
of the 'conspiracy' to replace the Emperor Ferdinand with
his young nephew,
the Archduke Franz, Grunne became a key figure in
the final preparations.
He drafted all the key documents and
proclamations.
As some of these were signed merely 'Franz', they were
not issued until
after it had been decided to add 'Joseph' to the
young Emperor's
name; consequently these documents had to be signed
again by him.
In April 1849 Grunne became deeply involved in Franz Joseph's
decision to
recall Fieldmarshal Prince Windisch-Graetz from command of
the forces charged
with putting down the revolution in Hungary. His
contacts among
the Hungarian nobility, within the Austrian Army and
even among Windisch-Graetz's
own officers, all urged him to intervene
with the Emperor
on the basis that the Fieldmarshal had lost the
initiative and
the situation was in an unstable stalemate.
Windisch-Graetz
was unaware of Grunne's role and remained on friendly
terms with him.
However, Windisch-Graetz was clearly hurt by his
recall after
decades of loyal service to the Crown, culminating in his
key role in
the accession of the young Emperor. It became Grunne's
task over some
years to mollify the old soldier's feelings while
protecting the
Emperor from the avalanche of advice and admonition
emanating from
Windisch-Graetz.
In April and May 1849 Grunne was deeply involved in the decision to
seek Russian
help in suppressing the uprising in Hungary. In this he
effectively
countered the advice of Minister-President Prince
Schwarzenberg
(the brother-in-law of Windisch-Graetz) against Russian
intervention.
Grunne's intervention was unsuccessful in one tragic
event of the
Hungarian campaign. Fieldmarshal Haynau,
Windisch-Graetz's
replacement, believed he had the authority to hand
out to the Hungarian
insurgents what punishment he saw fit, including
the death penalty.
He was determined to hang the thirteen Hungarian
Generals who
had led the uprising. Following a number of interventions
to Franz Joseph
on behalf of these men, pleading for their lives,
Grunne was sent
to Haynau to delay at least the executions until their
cases could
be reviewed. However, Haynau had bypassed Gr?nne's orders
and carried
out the executions. Although his intercession had failed,
Hungary remained
grateful to Gr?nne for his efforts and made him an
honorary citizen
of Arad where the executions had been carried out.
The accession
of the young Franz Joseph began with ten years of
Absolutist rule
over the Empire in sharp reaction to the upheaval of
the revolutions
in Vienna, Prague and Budapest. From the outset of his
reign, Franz
Joseph knew his own mind, and took advice only to the
extent of its
being consistent with the broad thrusts of his policies.
His first step,
with his decree of 30 April 1849, was to take overall
command of his
Army. This meant that all troop movements had to be
cleared with
him, as had all promotions above staff-officer and the
disposition
of all war materials. To give effect to this he created a
Military Central
Chancellery and appointed Gr?nne its first head as
his Adjutant-General
and First Adjutant-General of the Army. Grunne
was then forty.
During the early 1850's the Army was significantly reorganised
under Grunne.
The lines of command and responsibility were streamlined
both within
the Army and between it and the Minister for War. The
Ministry was
wound up and the Minister's responsibility considerably
reduced. The
Military Central Chancellery dealt with all military
strategic issues,
including all matters referred to it by the Emperor,
and oversighted
Army-conditions of service. All decisions, rules and
orders were
promulgated by the First Adjutant-General "On Highest
Authority".
No action could be carried out without his signature and
only he had
the right to sign in the Emperor's name.
The reorganisation of the Army was only partly carried through, as
it was significantly
impeded by the large troop reductions of 1853,
1855 and 1858
which, despite Grunne's objections, were pushed through
to relieve the
parlous state of the Austrian economy. Therefor the
Army's problems
of organisation could not be resolved as quickly as
the Emperor
and Gr?nne had wished. Discontent over the reforms,
especially over
the lengthened period of service, focused on Grunne,
though much
had been done in his name by others.
It is certain that, in his key position, Grunne had the closest
insight into
all military (and political) matters. It might have been
expected that
he would have exercised extraordinary power,but
paradoxically
this was never to be the case. This can only be
understood in
terms of the very strong, direct exercise of power by
the young Emperor,
and Grunne's relationship with him. Karl Grunne
became the Emperor's
Adjutant-General because there was no-one in the
immediate circle
of Franz Joseph and his family, in the traumatic
times leading
to his succession, who was more trusted. As well, their
views and approaches
were very similar. Franz Joseph used Grunne as a
counterweight
to his liberal Ministers, whose philosophical stance he
largely did
not share.
Theirs was a strong friendship to be unmatched again between the
Emperor and
one of his subjects. Grunne genuinely admired the Emperor
and loved him
like a son. The Emperor would visit him almost daily
and discussed
the most crucial matters of State with him. Hence Grunne
was mentor to
Franz Joseph in the key formative stage of his long
reign, and the
Emperor was to show extraordinary loyalty to him
throughout his
life.
Contrary to the account of many histories of this time, it is a
fact that Grunne
also enjoyed a close friendship with the Empress
Elisabeth, forged
at the outset by their mutual love of riding and
horses. He became
her mentor and confidant as well as the Emperor's.
Until about
1862 many letters from Elisabeth still in Dobersberg
testify to the
genuine warmth between them. As Elisabeth withdrew
increasingly
from the Emperor and the Court, Grunne found himself
drawn even more
into his familiar role of mediator. He was sent by the
Emperor to her
in Corfu in June 1861 as his emissary. The cause of the
final rift between
Grunne and the Empress is not known, but probably
stemmed from
a crucial intercession by him on the Emperor's behalf, or
at least some
decisive move by him to side with the Emperor. As
Elisabeth had
confided in Grunne, she may well have felt betrayed.
After the sudden
death of Karl Schwarzenberg in April 1852, Franz
Joseph decided
not to replace him as Minister-President and he himself
took on the
primary role in Cabinet. Schwarzenberg's death was a
tragic loss
with long term consequences, as his powerful personality
was no longer
there to keep the other Ministers in check and to guide
the young Emperor.
Grunne's poor relationships with Franz Joseph's
ministers are
well documented; they were jealous of his close
relationship
with the Emperor which led to the rejection of many of
their proposals.
As the Crimean crisis unfolded in 1854, Grunne strongly favoured
retaining the
Monarchy's friendship with Russia. Like all Austrian
conservatives,
he saw Russia as the last conservative power to which
the Monarchy
could turn in the battle against the drive for
independence
by the various nationalities. In this he found himself
out of step
with Franz Joseph, who began to turn increasingly against
Russia under
the influence of the liberal ministers, Bach and Buol.
They alienated
Russia without satisfying the Western powers. This set
the climate
for the final disaster of the Absolutist phase of Franz
Joseph's reign,
the Italian campaign of 1859.
Quoting his evidence of the advanced preparations of the Sardinian
and French armies,
Grunne argued strongly and repeatedly between
January and
March 1859 for a major build-up of the Austrian Second
Army stationed
in Italy. He was strenuously opposed by Buol who
rejected the
prospect that France would intervene for Sardinia, and by
Bach who argued
that the economy could not cope with the cost of a
troop build-up.
The Emperor sided with them.
A remarkable turnabout occurred at the Ministerial Conference of 6
April 1859.
The ministers who had consistently resisted all proposals
for expansion
of the army now argued that the right strategic moment
was at hand
for delivery of an Austrian ultimatum to Sardinia. Its
expected rejection
would create the circumstance for Austria to defeat
Piedmont quickly
before the French could intervene on its behalf.
Grunne saw the
greatest danger for Austria from such a move, given the
relative lack
of preparedness of the Austrian army in Italy, and
argued strenuously
against such a step until a build-up of that Army
had been completed.
The Emperor decided that the ultimatum should be
sent to Sardinia,
but that a troop build-up should only be approved if
France declared
for Piedmont.
Grunne showed understandable reluctance to take responsibility for
finding a military
solution to what he saw as a foreign policy
disaster which
would leave Austria completely isolated and militarily
unprepared.
The ultimatum had been sent at the worst possible moment.
If the Emperor
had taken his advice the later catastrophe of the
defeat of Magenta
might have been averted.
Grunne has been blamed for the choice of Gyulai to lead the
Austrian forces.
His appointment as Commander in Chief in Italy, to
replace Radetzky
following his retirement, had occurred in 1857; and
his credentials,
in an Army which had not fought a major conflict for
many years,
had seemed excellent. However he was patently inadequate
for the task.
Recognising this himself, he pleaded with the Emperor to
appoint a senior
commander over him. However, this was not done. In
hindsight it
should have been, though it is far from clear with whom.
After the slaughter of Magenta on 17 June 1859, the Emperor himself
took command
of the First and Second Armies. Given his complete
inexperience
in the leadership of large forces in battle, this did
nothing to counter
the succession of tactical blunders which
culminated in
the defeat at Solferino later that month. Although
Grunne accompanied
the Emperor, he neither sought, nor had any
significant
influence upon the conduct of the campaign. He recognised
that his strengths
were not those of a Chief-of-Staff, and did not
attempt to influence
operational issues.
The events of 1859 are fully documented in the histories of the
Monarchy. They
marked the end of the Absolutist phase of Franz
Joseph's rule.
The demand for change was overwhelming and to his great
credit he embraced
it. At the news of the surrender at Solferino, the
public demand
for Grunne's dismissal was intense. Grunne himself
pleaded to be
released but the Emperor refused. Grunne continued at
his post until
October when he again requested release from his
position. This
time Franz Joseph reluctantly agreed but appointed him
his Master of
the Horse and awarded him the Grand Cross of the Order
of St. Stephen.
At this point Karl Grunne left the stage of Austrian
history, though
without losing the favour of his Monarch. In 1864 he
was appointed
General of Cavalry. In 1865 he became patron of the 1st
Regiment of
Ulans and was awarded the Order of the Golden Fleece.
Until his death
Grunne managed the Emperor's private finances and,
until 1871,
administered the Emperor's private properties of Prater
and Krieau.
In 1875 he requested the Emperor's permission to retire.
He lived the
rest of his life with his family at Dobersberg but spent
long periods
at Baden when his health failed. The Emperor visited him
there several
times. He died in Baden on 15 June 1884.
Source: Leo van de Pas
|